Both sides edit stock—conflicts—teams then argue across ownership lines.
ERP Integration
Wrong stock isn't a support-script problem—systems must align. Clarify the boundary before choosing the build path.
Sync catalog, stock, orders and shipping states between store and ERP.
Integration pains
These usually show up before a project starts—or right after a rushed launch.
Silent sync failures until complaints—it often surfaces only after production impact.
Field maps live in someone's head—iteration and local integration slow down.
No plan to backfill historical orders—users feel it as inconsistent data or UX.
Single source of truth
Assign field owners; retryable alerts on failure; document maps; incremental sync first, then backfill. Confirm ERP APIs and master-data ownership, then sync direction, conflict rules and retries—avoid dual writes on the same fields.
Confirm ERP APIs and master-data ownership, then sync direction, conflict rules and retries—avoid dual writes on the same fields.
- Scope written before coding
- Milestones you can accept
- Handover notes included
Highlights
What this engagement typically covers.
Master-data ownership
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Sync direction design
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Conflict & retry
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Reconciliation support
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
What you get
- Integration adapter
- Sync jobs
- Mapping docs
- Alert policy
- Recon samples
How we work
-
01
ERP capability check, with written stage outputs.
-
02
Mapping design, with written stage outputs.
-
03
Integrate, with written stage outputs.
-
04
Parallel observe & cutover, with written stage outputs.
Ready to lock scope?
Name your ERP and API availability—we'll assess approach.